Archive for June, 2009

My Father’s Shoes

My Father’s Shoes

On those particularly boring days back home, Father would tell us the story of his life.  Born to a poor family, Father’s youth was spent on the hills outside the stead, gathering cassava alongside his father.  When the crop of rice or corn did not do well for the season, Father and his father went through the laborious process of digging kamoteng kahoy to add to the dinner table.  Some of the roots were eaten for the meal, although most of the roots were prepared, ground into flour, and made into cakes.  The snacks were then sold at the nearby school.

Father tells the story of how he always wanted a pair of shoes, so he worked so hard to dig up as much of the roots as he can.  There was no time for him to go to the playground: he headed straight for the bantay, with his schoolbooks and all, and with trowel and shovel worked the land with his father.  The sacks of roots were hauled down to the farmhouse and Father helped wth the turning of the grindstone.  Then he hit the books.

Selling kakanin pays a pittance, and whatever was earned paid for schoolbooks and the children’s allowance.  A brilliant boy, Father burned the midnight oil to show his parents he deserved a pair of shoes.  Yet no matter how high his grades were, Father always had to make do with the battered shoes his elder brothers handed down to him.  Mended as they were, they barely lasted a week into the schoolyear before the soles started to split.

Father’s insecurity has always been his shoes; by the time he was old enough and earned his own money, Father became an expert in footwear.  As children, Father always insisted that we buy this particular style of shoes, and that we always wear shoes.  None of us would be caught dead wearing sandals or slippers.  Wearing shoes became a force of habit, if not for the fact that Father didn’t want us to go through what he went through in his youth.

I somehow felt resentful for Father for telling us those “when I was your age” stories all the time, to the point that I led a path way different from where his puppet-strings led me.  I was not going to be the conduit of his dreams.  I grew my hair long and clad myself in black.  I didn’t burn the midnight oil, I didn’t take a summer job, and I moved out of his house when the opportunity presented itself.  The son he wanted to become a lawyer became a writer.  I went against every expectation he had, giving his controlling fatherhood the middle finger, and did things my own way.  I didn’t become prodigal or rebellious, but I steered clear of the path Father showed me.

So much so that for a time, I quit writing under my real name and insisted to use my pseudonym all the time.  I stopped when I came to terms with the fact that the last syllable of my pseudonym stands for the name of my Father.  No matter what I do, Father will always be that presence in my life, that I will always carry him with me.

I always wanted to be my own man, but even the most contrived attempts at being anything other than who my father is will always lead me to the familiar realization: if Father was insecure about his shoes, I was insecure about Father.  Every story he told about his childhood made me realize that I wanted to be like him, that I was craving for his attention, that I wanted to live up to standards he set.  The standards may be a little too high, but it always came push to shove.

Father wanted his shoes so bad that he went to the hills to break his body digging for roots.  Here I am wanting to be a writer so bad that I break my body putting words together.  There’s nothing to compare, and there’s nothing to suggest, except that we have so much – a little too much – in common.  Whether I like it or not, the more I moved away from my Father and his dreams for me, the more I came closer to them.  Rather than be my own man, the beaten path I took led me to the new ground Father made himself many years before.

No matter how much I tried escaping Father’s shadow, though, I always seem to be following in his footsteps.  While walking down the beaten paths of young writers, my feet are still clad in the shoes of my Father.  I still share the same taste as Father when it comes to shoes.

The towering, monumental, controlling presence in my life, the one who controlled my destiny, was still there no matter how much I tried to walk away from him.  No matter how much I tried to walk away from Father, there was always a bit of him that I carry along with me.

I remember a time that I borrowed a pair of shoes from Father.  ”Do they fit?” he asked, telling me to walk around the living room and see if I stayed on balance, if his shoes were good enough for me.  Years later, I realized that maybe, just maybe, I’m not good enough to be in my father’s shoes.

It’s time for me to create my own legacy, walk in my own shoes, and forge my own path… with the realization that the very path I’m making will always branch out from the path Father made for himself, and for us.  It’s the only thing I can do to do my Father justice.

Happy Father’s day, Dad.

June 21, 2009 2 comments Read More
The Slacker Effect: Resistance at a Time of Blogs, Dogtags, and Green Avatars

The Slacker Effect: Resistance at a Time of Blogs, Dogtags, and Green Avatars

In an interview for Inquirer.net Blogs, I mentioned that blog entries do not change the world.  The most that I can do as a blogger is to frame the perspective of at least half a dozen people about an issue.  Like I said, blogging is a channel for resistance; it is not the be-all-end-all of social change in “the age of information.”  You still have to go to rallies if necessary.

A Snopes.com article on “slacktivism” describes the phenomenon in blunt terms: it’s the kind of feel-good remedy to come to society’s rescue, or to participate in a cause, without having to get to the down-and-dirty work of going out to the streets, or taking a more active role in social change.  “Slacktivism” is often caricatured in things like product boycotts, Singles Awareness Day, and Earth Hour, but it also includes blogging, signing online petitions, and joining e-groups.

A week ago, AkoMismo.com distributed – OK, sold – a bunch of nifty black-and-red dog tags over at The Fort.  For P40, you get a nifty black-and-red dogtag that represents pledges and commitments made at the wall of commitments at the oft-criticized and oft-praised website.  My friends complained of the number of “orcs” hanging around Bonifacio High Street looking for the next wave of fashion, and I see quite a number of the tags everywhere.  Politics somewhat mixes with a fashion trend, but not everyone’s buying into it.  Take Boy Batikos, for example:

Shempre bagong-bago e kaya benta sa masa. At mukha kang cool pag suot mo ito, dahil red at black. At pag suot mo ren ito, makabayan ka. Pero hanggang dun na lang yun. Yung iba nga wala naman talagang panata eh. Hindi alam kung ano ba ibig sabihin nitong Ako Mismo. Basta nabalitaan lang na may cool na dog tag na uso ngayon kaya nagpabili na ren sa mga kakilala nila. Sus.

I’m a live-and-let-live kind of guy: if it takes a bunch of dog tags for an organization to effect a socio-civic and political consciousness among the youth, and the youth buy into it, then it must make sense.  The effort does not have to be applauded, it just has to make sense.  Never mind that it’s P40, you probably don’t have a clue of what AkoMismo.com is, and you have no idea what those dog tags represent and where’s the money going to.  It’s just there.

Or green avatars in Twitter, for example.  Beyond #IranElection hashtags, many people have turned their Twitter avatars green to show support for democracy and freedom in Iran.  Yet it begs the question: does it accomplish anything?  Of course it does: it informs the public, it stands in solidarity with a cause of democracy for Iran, but it really doesn’t free the place, does it?  We’re looking for something absolute, concrete, and tangible that a cause like Iran is so remote from us, so irrelevant, and we really can’t do anything about it except call the attention of #cnnfail.  Never mind that the overwhelming support of the Twitter community for democracy in Iran may now be treated as the issue, that the cause of democracy in Iran may be part of that long resumé of the importance of new media and the digital democracy.  Or that democracy in Iran may be thought of as only possible because of the Twitter community.

I don’t want to get started on blogging, though: the stuff of blogtroversy has gone beyond the Ian Uy’s and Tracy Borres’s of the world, and have sort of made headlines and spotlights.  Familiar territory for me, at least: impeachment complaints, the BJE MOA-AD, Brian Gorell’s complaint, and lately, the movement against Con-Ass.  So much so that many people – bloggers included – now consider the Net as “the next battleground.”  Yet that begs the question: in the grand scheme of things, how much do these efforts really matter?

What do these things accomplish?

I’m not going to be contrarian: I think I’ve done way too many things in my life as a dissenting, destabilizing blogger to not be in that position anymore.  However, it is important to be critical.  These days, action is instant: websites, images, dog tags, applications are many and fast.  We expect the same thing for the effect of the cause: many, and fast.  So much so that the hard work and elbow grease needed for social change to happen is ignored.  You no longer have to rally when there’s a “No to Con-Ass” banner on your blog, and you don’t have to fulfill your basic commitment as a citizen because that many-and-fast thing starts and ends with a pledge at AkoMismo.  Rather than technology becoming an instrument of resistance, technology becomes resistance.  For many of us, it begins and ends with using the technology, going through the motions of a blog entry or a graphics change, and everything falls into place.

More than that, we think of instant, tangible, quantifiable results for every little or big thing that we do.  To use a cliché, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Don’t get me wrong: I don’t advocate slacktivism, I don’t promote it, and I don’t practice it. I go to the streets when needed, and I’ve seen my own fair share of police officers and riot guards aside from being a bystander. I’ve been there, and I continue to be there when the opportunity presents itself. It’s not the first time, though, that I’ve encountered the “slacktivist” pejorative thrown at me directly or indirectly.

The most a blog can do is to act as a frame for a perspective, and to inform its readers about issues. There will come a time that a blog entry will probably change the world, but that time is not now. At the most, bloggers are doing a very good job in informing people and being channels for the opinions of ordinary people. However, that comes with the warning that if all you ever do is to work within that very artificial limit, do not expect the change to happen the way you expect them to.

While I’m very idealistic about a lot of things, I am very jaded when it comes to blogging. Like opinion columns in newspapers, blogs provide a perspective to an issue. The slacktivist, however, would say that it is the way of the future; that the “Information Age” will lead to the Internet being the new battleground, or that the future of rallies and social action for social change will take place in forums and chatrooms. While I’m not disagreeing with that possibility, that kind of logic dismisses the fact that we are in actual, physical society. The same goes for hecklers: the “hanggang rally lang kayo” crowd, or the “hanggang blog lang kayo” segment of society, who stand by the wayside and justify their inaction – or refusal to participate – as observation.

I think the most important lesson to all of this is that we should always remember that most of our obligations and duties as citizens are offline.  Out there, the many-and-the-fast does not exist, and we always need to commit ourselves to the elbow grease and the hard work of changing society for the better.  That the commitment to blog, or to have a dogtag, or to have a green avatar should always be manifested offline.  The two simplest things you can do (which are apparently no longer simple) are to pay your taxes, and to express your dissent.

Big things come in small packages, but you always get what you put in. Blogs and online petitions are tools, but you cannot build a house just by using a hammer. Like many things about activism, blogging is just one of the many tools you can use to effect change. Using just one tool to build a house, though – or destroy it, whichever comes first – is but the folly only fools can make.

Original posted 4:24 PM, this is a very heavy rewrite.  - Marocharim

June 19, 2009 3 comments Read More
Emostroika

Emostroika

nqOmZJyoemoI’m sure that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Emos (PETE) are as mad as I am with This Government, but they’re probably more mad at the Russian Duma.  Sean Michaels (he’s got the news, that drives the girls wild) of The Guardian reports that a new law seeks to curb “dangerous teen trends” in the nation.  The hearing-ski on “Government Strategy in the Sphere of Spiritual and Ethical Education” has shades of Stalin in it, but the Duma basically seeks to ban emo.

The new bill describes “emos” in rather blunt terms, which sort of represents the political evolution of Russia post-glasnost. Michaels reports: “The new bill describes ‘emos’ as 12-16 year-olds with black and pink clothing, studded belts, painted fingernails, ear and eyebrow piercings, and black hair with fringes that ‘cover half the face’.”

Wonderful.  Needless to say, Russian emos don’t like it.

While I have yet to hear of sit-ins involving mass wrist-slashing and decorating Chucks with chalk portraits of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, I’m sure that indignation among Russian emo-teens is on an all-time high.  After all, the new bill may make a lifestyle choice – a personal preference - in a country illegal.  That personal preference is being equated by the old-fart Duma as akin and similar to things like Nazism and organized crime.  I’m not so sure that the Russia’s long experiment with democracy is showing signs of success, though, in repressing a Western lifestyle choice.  One among many that have entered a sheltered Russian cultural pool since the long downfall of the Soviet Union.

I’m not “emo,” but I think that it sucks to even think about controlling lifestyle choices in a democracy.  Sure, we disagree with a lot of things about emo, if not for the fact that a lot about emo is based on stereotypes.  You’re welcome to disagree about lifestyle choices in a free society, or even look down upon them.  Yet in a free society, no person is free to impinge and to dictate upon lifestyle choices.  Even if people disagree with those choices.

Just because you’re in a position of power, or just because you hold yourself on a higher plane in the canons of taste, doesn’t mean that you can use the apparatuses of power to dictate upon the independent choices of independent teenagers in an independent country.

I love music.  Music, to me, is anarchy; where people are free to make choices, where people are free to agree and to disagree.  Here in the Philippines, we have an expression among musically-inclined circles: Walang basagan ng trip. That phrase, to me, means that music is the last thing that keeps us free.  On those many occasions that we are not free to make choices, we can always be free in music.  When people start passing stupid laws like these and act upon their own discrimination, the last vestiges of our freedom – free speech – is challenged.  Like I always say here, I may not agree with what you have to say, but I agree with your right to say it.

It’s bad enough to put up with censors in the music industry, and it’s bad enough that we have to put up with people lambasting our choices and preferences in music or dress.  It’s bad enough that emos have to go through the snickering and sniggering looks of people like myself who just don’t like them.  Maybe the emo kids of Russia should have bigger things to worry about.  Yet the fact that they stand up for something that they believe is so essential should be a timely reminder to us that freedom is always challenged.  We have to put our foot down.  We have to fight not only for the things that we enjoy, but the things that make us people: music, clothes, and a belief.

We must resist, no matter how simple that infraction to our freedom is.

June 16, 2009 4 comments Read More
Midnight Rain

Midnight Rain

I don’t want to see the raindrops on my apartment window.

I imagine you peering through your window watching those droplets trickle on the other side of the glass.  You trace the movement of each and every one with your fingers.  I imagine you crying as you think of heartbreak and heartache.  All the frustrations, pains, and sorrows that you’ve hidden from the world are here and now.

Then you end up tracing my name.  The clouded, fogged-up glass of your bedroom window bears my name.

I turned off the lights in this room.  I want to see my words clearly.  I want to concentrate.  All I want to see tomorrow is sunshine and traffic.  I want the normal, the ordinary, the mundane.

The pattering of the rain doesn’t lull me to sleep.  Rather, it keeps me awake.  I want God to be in His heaven, so that all is right with the world.

If that were the case, then there would be no need for the words of Borges: Heaven will cease to exist, because our place is not Hell.  There would be no need for adversity in a perfect world, without heartbreak and without heartache.  There would be no need for rain at this time of the night.  Angels won’t have to cry for you at night when your eyes are closed, and your pillows are soaked in tears.

I wouldn’t have to think of some reasons to explain precipitation.  Reasons and lines that would probably get struck out of a draft for a children’s book.  After all, it’s just rain at 12 AM; singers and songwriters have incorporated the word “rain” in more songs than you and I – or you or I – can possibly imagine.

I’m feeling you… but at the same time, are you feeling me?  Are these thoughts just consequences of midnight rainshowers, keeping you awake as well?  Don’t let me go, now that I don’t have you yet.

The rain won’t let up, but I don’t want to turn on the lights.  I don’t want to see the raindrops falling on my window; not today but tomorrow, when the sky is clear and there’s nothing in this world to fear.  Where there are no raindrops at all.

Right now, I don’t want to see the name written on that window… yours.

June 16, 2009 1 comment Read More
Wrapped In Plastic, It’s Fantastic

Wrapped In Plastic, It’s Fantastic

Me and a few friends tried to score tickets to some frou-frou independent film a couple of days ago at EDSA Shangri-La when we came across the woman herself, my own personal writing idol, Miss Jessica Zafra.  I tried writing like JZ at one point in my life and realized I can’t do it.  I still respect and “idolize” her very much in the way she uses the English language.  I was about three feet away from bowing at her feet, or at least stealing her glasses.

One of the most memorable essays I loved from the Twisted series was her series on wrapping books in plastic covers.  Since tomorrow marks the beginning of the school year, I’m reminded all of a sudden about plastic school supplies, and books and notebooks wrapped in plastic.

I never really did master the art of wrapping anything in plastic covers; Mother and my cousins did all the wrapping work for us.  The first day of school greeted you with a schoolbag with plastic-wrapped everything: books, notebooks, plastic envelopes with the multiplication tables and spelling booklets wrapped in plastic, your plastic pencil case with your plastic pens and plasticine erasers still in the plastic packaging, the crayons still wrapped in tamper-proof plastic.  If it rains, Mother packs everything up in plastic bags before packing them up into our school bags.

Every parent in elementary school pretty much did the same thing Mother did, and that had interesting consequences at the classroom.  When we took out a notebook, the plastic covers were stuck to each other, and we ended up taking out three or five notebooks at once.  We all took out ballpens from their plastic packaging, and the garbage bin eventually gets filled up with plastic rubbish.

Mother always took the time to bring us lunch, until we were old enough to go home for the lunch break.  The rest of our classmates had lunchboxes.  The days of Army-style tin lunchboxes weren’t hip back in the early 1990s.  Only thumb-sucking baby-types came with those Panini Disney Princesses or Lion King lunchboxes that were effective containers for Tupperware.

Everyone was (literally) saddled with a giant hulking schoolbag, so the in thing were those all-in-one lunchboxes complete with juice container and plastic forks.  White-and-red Coleman containers were made of awesome, but the black ones with small containers for viands and rice and cupcakes were the standard for us.  If you didn’t like the corned-beef-and-eggs or luncheon-meat-with-eggs or hotdogs-and-eggs your mom spent around ten minutes cooking for you.

That didn’t do much for eating habits that meant using up more plastic.  Lunches were usually left uneaten or thrown away, so almost every kid made a beeline for sidewalk snackage.  Or Trump cards and goma for sipa or Chinese garter.  Zoom Zoom cheese snacks were cool, because of the plastic soldiers – or if you’re lucky, dodecahedral two-peso coins – that you get for the fifty-centavo snacks.  Snow cream was popular although it did taste like plastic (and led to mild cholera), but the highlight of everyone’s day was cotton candy spun from converted Singer sewing machines.  Iced Gem Cookies were cool and all, but I’ve always had a soft spot for strawberry-flavored Yan-Yan.

These days, the backpack is now a convenient container for non-school-y stuff; a laptop, some pens, a portable ashtray, some knick-knacks here and there, and bus and train tickets that remind me that my innocent childhood – spent ostracized from playgrounds and playing around with Legos – has come and gone.  No more plastic covered stuff, no more plastic stuff.  Kids are off to their Neverland of learning and building up their memories tomorrow.  For us, who wax (rant) lyrically and nostalgically about days gone by, those memories will stay just as they are: days gone by, wrapped in the plastic of time itself.

Bollocks on that, but yeah, “starstruck” was a good way to describe being just a few feet away from Jessica Zafra.

June 14, 2009 0 comments Read More
Mitsuharu Misawa (1962-2009)

Mitsuharu Misawa (1962-2009)

As a fan of professional wrestling, I write this entry to pay tribute to one of the legends of puroresu, and professional wrestling in general: Mitsuharu Misawa.

The Wrestling Observer/Figure Four Online reports that on June 13, 2009, the legendary Misawa received a wrestling maneuver that knocked him unconscious, causing him to suffer and die from a heart attack in the ring.

For 28 years, Misawa made his name not only as the second Tiger Mask or the innovator of many wrestling maneuvers (like the Tiger Driver and the Emerald Flowsion), but for his technical prowess and skill in the ring.  His matchups with legends like Akira Taue and the late great Jumbo Tsuruta have made him a legend in the eyes not only of Japanese puroresu fans, but of wrestling aficionados all over the world.  His rivals and foes in the ring read like a who’s who for any wrestling fan: Keiji Mutoh, Jun Akiyama, Kensuke Sasaki, and (arguably) his greatest rival to date, Toshiaki Kawada.

The long, storied career of Misawa led to many titles and honors; if there’s any debate on who was “the greatest wrestler in the world,” those in the discussion would make a grievous mistake to not include Misawa.  Besides being a skilled technician in the ring, Misawa was also a wrestling promoter who took the Japanese puroresu world by surprise.  After leading and leaving All-Japan Pro Wrestling (AJPW) after the death of Giant Baba, Misawa founded one of the most innovative and recognizable pro wrestling organizations in the East: Pro Wrestling NOAH.

Unlike the stereotypical pro wrestler, wrestling was the central point of Misawa’s career.  Misawa won titles and the respect of the international audience for his skill and technique in wrestling.  He had an extensive array of attacks and moves incorporated with technique that made him one of the premier wrestlers in the world.  Stiff strikes, counter-wrestling, submissions, and innovative slams and suplexes were consistent in Misawa’s wrestling repertoire.  Misawa was without peers as a singles wrestler, but shone through as a tag team specialist as well.

A wrestler’s wrestler, Misawa earned the pounds of gold he wore around his waist not because of storylines and gimmicky segment-breaks, but because of his wrestling style and skill that takes years to hone and master.  For a time, Misawa was arguably the most famous and renowned wrestler in Japan, if not the world.  Misawa was a multiple-time world champion with AJPW, New Japan Pro Wrestling (NJPW), and his own NOAH promotion.

The death of Misawa in a wrestling ring is tragic and saddening, but it again puts him in a place where he is without peers.  In the tradition of Japanese wrestling, Mitsuharu Misawa now stands with icons who have departed this Earth, like Baba and Rikidozan.  Yet Misawa stands alone, not only as a champion wrestler, an innovator of offense, or an ace promoter, but as one of the figureheads who brought a kind of sophisticated, professional, engaging wrestling back to the squared circle.

Mitsuharu Misawa will be missed, but his legacy will be remembered, continued, and will live on.  Thank you for the wrestling, Mr. Misawa.

June 14, 2009 0 comments Read More