Comments on: Malice in Wonderland

By: Pong

Pong — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:24:17 +0000

@Marocharim
opinionissues will not answer, why? mushroom.

great writing! keep it up God bless

By: Marocharim

Marocharim — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:23:03 +0000

Okay. Let me just say this once: I was asking you for your *case.* You started this from a perspective of “seeing both sides of the story.” Then you translated your case to “being fair and responsible.” During the course of accommodating your case on my blog, you turned it into a semantic argument and a case of dictionary definitions. Then you go about with your own blog defending yourself from a accusation of being paid.

That you are committing yourself to even the most minute details of this issue is not a “problem,” as much as it is problematic; from there, I don’t know if you’ll turn it into an editorial problem. Ano ba talaga? That’s precisely what an opinion on an issue is for: that the meat of the issue, the very substance by which our opinions are founded on, are tested in the crucible of debate. When I’m asking you for your case I’m not asking for a recap of your arguments: I’m asking for your stand on the issue that you seem to be so passionate about? Are you for Ella? Are you for Cabral? Do you care? Or do you take an iwas-pusoy position by being so obsessed with details that you pass an empty argument?

I think my point is clear: with the details presented by both sides on their own avenues with their own methods guaranteed by their rights, a libel case is overkill. I fail to see yours, other than “I will continue to post and make it seem like I’m being fair even if it’s clear I am against Ella on this one.”

Am I correct in assuming that?

By: Marocharim

Marocharim — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:06:01 +0000

The last word:

Sugar potato banana honey beer.

By: opiniononissues

opiniononissues — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:51:12 +0000

I already answered the points you raised above so I guess that wraps it up.

*facepalm*

By: opiniononissues

opiniononissues — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:46:10 +0000

To be perfectly honest, I do not know why you are taking it out here, when you can take it out on Ella. Assuming that this blog takes the character of a courtroom what is your case

Please note, this is what I posted:

As of this writing, Ella has referred to my post here (as well as in other sites) in one of her comments. In respect for the sites I have submitted my posts to, here’s my reply:
http://issuesopinions.wordpress.com.

Your reply to this discussed that you side with Ella on some points and may not necessarily agree with how she presented her take on the matter. You also discussed you believe Cabral shouldn’t have filed a libel case. My take on these, I have already discussed in the blog you visited.

Your closing statement, that about etymology is what I replied to because you said:

oh, and by the way, you’re abusing etymology. careful careful. a very slippery slope you’re on, my friend. you’re assuming that one word strictly defines this and this definition strictly adheres to that situation (read: synonyms and antonyms).

Since you raised this , I had to give you a reply. The complete response’s already posted above.